Baneado

team_NON_EXISTEN1
Ganador

team_Bulka812
Baneado
Baneado
Baneado
Baneado
Baneado
Baneado
Elegido
team_NON_EXISTEN1 vs team_Bulka812 · de_mirage
Cómo se desarrolló el partida ronda por ronda. Selecciona una ronda para ver quién la ganó, cómo y qué hizo cada jugador.
La historia
team_NON_EXISTEN1 lo cerró 13–5 en la parte posterior de una carrera redonda 7. El punto de inflexión fue alrededor de 1.
Resultados ronda por ronda
Seleccione una ronda en la línea de tiempo para inspeccionarla.
team_NON_EXISTEN1
Puntuación final
team_Bulka812
18 rounds

Takeaways
team_NON_EXISTEN1’s longest winning run lasted 7 rounds on the way to 13–5. · Round 1 is the hinge—what changed in the calls or spacing?
NON_EXISTEN1 won a 1v2 in round 18. · Hero play, patient isolation, or a round the other team will want back?
Bulka812 won a 1v1 in round 10. · Hero play, patient isolation, or a round the other team will want back?
See where each player rose above or fell below the lobby, one round at a time.
Player versus lobby
Each bar shows the selected player above or below that round's lobby median. Select one to inspect that round's swing.
-trylocked-
team_Bulka812Above the lobby median in 5 of 18 rounds
Match avg
0.24
Peak round
R4 · 1.43
Takeaways
ttv-alirana led average Rating 3.0 at 2.21 across 18 rounds. · Was ttv-alirana consistently involved, or just better at turning small advantages into round wins?
NON_EXISTEN1 produced the sharpest spike in round 2, finishing 5.72 above the lobby median. · What created the spike: a clean opening, a multi-kill, or survival after the damage?
El Rating 3.0 de cada jugador en cada ronda. Las filas son jugadores, las columnas son rondas; las células más brillantes son rondas más fuertes.
Cada jugador, cada ronda
Seleccione una ronda para mantener toda la página sincronizada.
| Jugador | promedio | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.21 | -0.14 | -0.33 | 1.43 | -0.33 | 0.92 | 0.07 | 1.16 | 0.14 | -0.08 | 1.34 | -0.05 | -0.24 | 0.16 | -0.01 | -0.24 | -0.34 | -0.33 | 0.24 | |
| 1.83 | 6.17 | 2.77 | 1.29 | 3.56 | 1.02 | -0.33 | 2.23 | -0.50 | -0.38 | 0.30 | 1.91 | 1.15 | 2.23 | 0.05 | 1.86 | 3.90 | 4.50 | 1.87 | |
| -0.12 | 1.45 | 1.77 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 5.70 | 1.18 | 1.30 | 2.29 | 5.55 | 2.96 | 0.37 | 1.46 | -0.38 | 1.54 | 0.19 | 1.69 | 2.21 | 1.71 | |
| 3.28 | -0.33 | 2.44 | 0.04 | -0.38 | 0.11 | 4.87 | 5.33 | 2.85 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 3.89 | 2.10 | 6.21 | 0.81 | 3.82 | 1.21 | 2.21 | |
| 2.80 | -0.24 | 0.78 | 1.16 | 2.38 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 1.35 | 0.22 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 2.19 | 2.37 | 2.31 | 2.38 | 0.16 | 1.24 | 1.20 | |
| 0.92 | 2.20 | 1.93 | 0.06 | -0.33 | 0.00 | 1.43 | 0.26 | -0.16 | -0.33 | 1.36 | 3.78 | -0.33 | 0.29 | 0.78 | 1.53 | -0.24 | -0.33 | 0.71 | |
| 0.22 | -0.13 | -0.23 | 3.83 | -0.26 | 0.50 | 1.21 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 1.15 | 3.37 | -0.24 | 0.13 | 1.63 | -0.38 | 0.36 | -0.54 | 1.01 | 0.66 | |
| 2.23 | 1.49 | 0.41 | 1.50 | 1.10 | 1.39 | 1.53 | 0.70 | 3.69 | 1.54 | 0.60 | 0.10 | 0.12 | -0.21 | 1.52 | -0.00 | 1.40 | 1.67 | 1.15 | |
| -0.32 | 1.02 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 3.40 | 1.09 | 2.41 | 0.78 | -0.38 | 1.89 | -0.33 | 2.66 | 2.41 | 2.48 | 0.00 | 3.27 | 0.87 | 1.42 | 1.39 | |
| 0.00 | -0.35 | 0.88 | 1.19 | 1.22 | 0.82 | -0.18 | 0.40 | 2.40 | 0.28 | 0.86 | -0.33 | -0.11 | 0.16 | 0.26 | -0.18 | 1.21 | -0.12 | 0.47 |
Takeaways
NON_EXISTEN1 beat the lobby median in 13 of 18 rated rounds. · Which repeatable habit kept NON_EXISTEN1 on the bright side of the grid?
Información del primer contacto ronda por ronda: quién tomó el duelo inicial, cuándo y cómo cambió en cada ronda.
Duelos de apertura
18
Promedio de primera muerte
22.0s
Promedio en reloj: 01:33:02
Tasa de disparos a la cabeza
0%
Abridor más rápido: 7.6s
Takeaways
Bulka812 secured 4 opening kills, the most in the match. · Was Bulka812 finding the timing, or did the team keep creating the first fight?
CashOverall was caught in the first duel 4 times. · Was that the cost of making space, or a first-contact pattern worth changing?